If you want to know why so many people hate capitalism even though the capitalist system of economic management has allowed humanity to raise it's standard of living by leaps and bounds since it was first implemented read The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality by Ludwig von Mises.如果你想知道為什麼這麼多人恨資本主義，即使在資本主義制度的經濟管理使人類能夠提高它的生活水平的跨越式，因為它已開始實施，改為反資本主義的心態 ，路德維希馮米塞斯。 [1] [1]
von Mises was an influential Austrian economist of the 20 th century who emigrated to the United States in 1940.馮米塞斯的影響力，奧地利經濟學家在20世紀誰移民到美國在1940年。 [2] [2]
In this book he argues that people hate capitalism because deep down they know capitalism has given them the opportunity to be as successful as they desire (who's stopping you from starting the next Google?) but they either didn't or couldn't make it happen.在這本書中，他認為，人們痛恨資本主義，因為他們知道內心深處資本主義給了他們機會一樣成功，他們的願望（誰是阻止您從開始下谷歌？），但他們要么沒有或無法令發生。
“What makes people feel unhappy under capitalism is the fact that capitalism grants to each the opportunity to attain the most desirable positions which, of course, can only be attained by a few. “什麼令人感到不快，在資本主義制度下的是，資本主義的贈款，每個有機會達到最理想的位置，當然，只能實現由少數。 Whatever a man may have gained for himself, it is mostly a mere fraction of what his ambition has impelled him to win.無論一個人可以為自己獲得了，這主要是只有小部分，就是他的野心促使他獲勝。 There are always before his eyes people who have succeeded where he has failed.總有一些人在他眼前誰取得了成功，他失敗了。 There are fellows who have outstripped him and against whom he nurtures, in his subconsciousness, inferiority complexes.有研究員誰已經超過他，他對培養人，在他的潛意識，自卑感。 Such is the attitude of the tramp against the man with a regular job, the factory hand against the foreman, the executive against the vice-president, the vice-president against the company's president, the man who is worth three hundred thousand dollars against the millionaire and so on.這種態度是對的流浪漢男子用固定的工作，另一方面對工廠的工頭，行政對副總統，副總統對公司的總裁，該名男子誰是值得三○○○○○美元兌百萬富翁等。 Everybody's self-reliance and moral equilibrium are undermined by the spectacle of those who have given proof of greater abilities and capacities.每個人的自力更生和道義上的平衡受到破壞的場面那些已證明誰更大能力和行為能力。 Everybody is aware of his own defeat and insufficiency.”每個人都意識到自己的失敗和不足。“ [3] [3]
In a pre-capitalist “status” society nobility, rank, and birth determined where you stood in the social hierarchy.在一個前資本主義“狀態”的社會貴族，職級和生育決定你站在社會等級。 Your “place” in the world was static and you could feel better about yourself: you weren't the king because you weren't born a king and it wasn't your fault.你的“位置”世界是靜態的，你可以感覺到更好地了解自己：你不是國王，因為你不是生在一個國王，這不是你的錯。
But in a capitalist economy operating in a free society you don't have that excuse.但是，在資本主義經濟運行在一個自由的社會，你沒有這樣的藉口。
Why?為什麼？
Because with capitalism a person is not rewarded economically because of their birth rank but in accordance “to his contribution to the well-being of his fellow men and where thus everybody is the founder of his own fortune.”由於同資本主義不是一個人在經濟上的回報，因為他們的出生級，但“按照他的貢獻福祉男子和他的同胞，因此每個人都在創辦人是他自己的財富。” [4] [4]
The consumer is king.消費者為王。
The person able to meet the unsatisfied demands of the most consumers in the cheapest and best way possible gets the most “status points” (money).的人能滿足得不到滿足的需求最消費者最便宜的和最好的方式可能獲得最多“狀態點”（錢）。
More importantly, everyone is free to try to “de-throne” the existing economic order at any time and make a fortune of their own by appealing to the “sovereign consumer.”更重要的是，每個人都可以自由地嘗試“非王位”現有的經濟秩序在任何時候，作出自己的財富的呼籲，向“主權消費者。”
It may be hard, but if you want to dis-lodge Coke as the global soft-drink powerhouse make a better soft drink more people want to drink.可能很難，但如果你想解散提出可口可樂作為全球軟飲料巨頭作出一個更好的軟飲更多的人想喝水。
Can't?不能？ Don't know how?不知道如何？
Then it's your lack of knowledge, will, and/or ability that is the cause of your frustrated ambition, not capitalism.然後你缺乏知識，意志和/或能力，這是你的事業感到失望的野心，不是資本主義的。
“It is-in a market not sabotaged by government-imposed restrictions, exclusively your fault if you do not outstrip the chocolate king, the movie star and the boxing champion.” “這是在不破壞市場由政府限制，完全你的錯，如果你不超出巧克力國王，電影明星和拳擊冠軍。” [5] [5]
von Mises argues it is this knowledge of one's limitations, revealed by capitalism, that breeds a deep resentment among people who have failed to achieve the level of success they want but who are also unable to admit they are the cause of their failure.馮米塞斯認為，正是這種認識的有限，揭示資本主義，滋生了深刻的怨恨人民之間誰也不能達到的水平，他們想要的成功，但誰也不能承認它們是導致其失敗。
It's much easier and psychologically more satisfying to blame capitalism for your failures:它更容易和更滿意的心理歸咎於資本主義的失敗：
“In order to console himself and to restore his self-assertion, such a man is in search of a scapegoat. “為了安慰自己，並恢復他的自我主張，這樣的人在尋找一個替罪羊。 He tries to persuade himself that he failed through no fault of his own.他試圖說服自己，他沒有任何過錯，通過他自己的。 He is at least as brilliant, efficient, and industrious as those who outshine him.他至少是同樣出色，高效，和勤勞的那些誰勝過他。 Unfortunately, this nefarious social order of ours does not accord the prizes to the most meritorious men; it crowns the dishonest unscrupulous scoundrel, the swindler, the exploiter, the 'rugged individualist.'不幸的是，這種邪惡的社會秩序，我們不給予獎勵，對最優秀的男人，它矗立在不誠實無良流氓，是騙子，剝削者，是'堅固的個人主義。 What made himself fail was his honesty.是什麼讓自己不被他的誠實。 He was too decent to resort to the base tricks to which his successful rivals owe their ascendancy.他太體面訴諸基地的技巧，他的成功歸功於他們的對手優勢。 As conditions are under capitalism, a man is forced to choose between virtue and poverty on the one hand, and vices and riches on the other.由於條件是在資本主義制度下，一個人是被迫選擇美德與貧窮一方面，和罪惡和財富，另一方面。 He, himself, thank God, chose the former alternative and rejected the latter.”他，他感謝上帝，選擇了前者的替代，拒絕了後者。“ [6] [6]
Sound familiar?聽起來很熟悉？
Does this mean capitalism gives us total control over our destiny?這是否意味著資本主義讓我們完全控制了我們的命運？
Of course not:當然不是：
“It cannot remove or alleviate the innate handicaps with which nature has discriminated against many people. “它不能消除或減輕先天缺陷的性質與歧視的人。 It cannot change the fact that many are born sick or become disabled in later life.”它不能改變的事實，很多人都出生生病或殘疾在以後的生活。“ [7] [7]
But it can give you a chance to earn the wealth you want through your own efforts.但它可以給你一個機會賺取的財富想要通過自己的努力。
If you choose to pursue work in a field that serves less consumers and therefore receives less “economic votes” (money), writing philosophy as opposed to making Coke for example, you're free to do so and enjoy the rewards that come from that line of work.如果您選擇繼續工作，在服務領域的消費者較少，因此收到較少的“經濟票”（錢），寫哲學，而不是使可口可樂例如，你可以這樣做的，享受獎勵來自該線工作。
Just don't get angry at “the system” because you're getting less money than the person who satisfies the wants and needs of more people successfully.只是不要生氣在“系統”，因為你的錢越來越少的人誰比滿足的需求和慾望更多的人成功。
That's how it's supposed to work and it's a fair system: if you want to be economically rich you're free to do so right after you finish reading this post.這就是它應該工作，這是一個公平的制度：如果你想在經濟上富裕你可以這樣做的權利，讀完之後，你這個職位。
All you have to do is figure out a way to satisfy the wants and needs of more “sovereign consumers” and take Winston Churchill's advice literally: “Never, never, never, never give up.”你所要做的就是找出一種方式，以滿足需求和慾望的更多“消費者主權”，並採取溫斯頓丘吉爾的意見，從字面上：“永遠，永遠，永遠，永遠不會放棄。”
[1] [1] Ludwig Von Mises. The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality .米塞斯。 反資本主義的心態 。 (New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1956). （紐約：D.諾斯特蘭德公司，1956年）。
[2] [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises
[3] [3] von Mises, 12-13.馮米塞斯，12-13。
[4] [4] Ibid, 15.同上，15。
[5] [5] Ibid, 10.同上，10。
[6] [6] Ibid, 14.同上，14。
[7] [7] Ibid, 10.同上，10。
{ 7 comments… read them below or （7條評論...閱讀下面或 add one添加一個 } ）
I would like to point you to a review of Mises' aforementioned book on Amazon which pretty much rebuts your article:我想指出你的審查米瑟斯的上述這本書在亞馬遜幾乎反駁你的文章： http://www.amazon.com/review/R24G7E0RJNGV3/ref=cm_cr_pr_cmt?%5Fencoding=UTF8&ASIN=0865976716 http://www.amazon.com/review/R24G7E0RJNGV3/ref=cm_cr_pr_cmt？％5Fencoding = UTF8的＆ASIN來= 0865976716
Well Mike, I wouldn't use the word “rebut” but it does lay out the other side of the argument.那麼邁克，我不會用“反駁”，但它奠定了對方的論點。 What it comes down to, from my point of view, are these points: is there a difference between earned and unearned wealth?; even if some people make their money without earning it in our system of capitalism because of government favors etc, does that negate the fundamental argument von Mises is making?它涉及到，從我的角度來看，有以下幾點：是否有區別來之不易，不勞而獲的財富？，即使有些人會不賺錢的錢在我們的制度是資本主義，因為政府的主張等，這是否否定的基本參數馮米塞斯的決策？ If you read the whole book you will see he is quite aware of the impact of government intereference, inheritance, and other wealth “delivering” factors that have nothing to do with ability.如果您閱讀整本書你會看到他十分了解的影響政府intereference，繼承和其他財富“發放”的因素有沒有關係的能力。 Yet, his point is, those are the exceptions and not the rule in a capitalist economy.然而，他的觀點是，這些是例外而不是規則的資本主義經濟。 Moreover, the people who get their money that way, as long as they are not protected generation after generation by some government power, will eventually lose that wealth because they do not know how it was produced in the first place.此外，人民的錢誰獲得這種方式，只要他們不是一代又一代人的保護，一些政府的權力，最終會失去財富，因為他們不知道它是如何生產擺在首位。 Thanks for the link to the review and your comment.感謝您的鏈接的審查和你的評論。
The von Mises argument is simply petty.馮米塞斯的說法只不過是小。 I think the obvious failure of capitalism is that in the end it is a criminal enterprise all together.我認為顯然是資本主義的失敗，最終它是一個企業的所有共同犯罪。 Taken to its logical ends, it can only end with human abuse and destruction of nature.兩者的邏輯結束，它只能是人類濫用和破壞自然。 There is no other possible endpoint.沒有其他可能的端點。 When I say “criminal” I mean that it fails to deliver any natural justice because it wall always follow the path of least resistance – a path which devalues Man (because it is cheaper and possible to do so) and destroys nature, the ultimate source of the wealth.當我說“罪犯”我的意思是它沒有提供任何自然正義，因為它總是走壁阻力最小的方向-一個路徑是貶低人（因為它更便宜，可以這樣做），和破壞自然，最終的來源的財富。
Following the path of least resistance is the essential part of the profit algorithm.繼阻力最小的方向是必不可少的一部分利潤算法。 ie Far easier (profitable) to dump waste in the river than to reprocess it safely.即要容易得多（利潤），傾倒廢物的河流，而不是重新處理它安全。 Far more profitable to drive labor costs down, than to pay for the long term well-being of employees, and so on.更加有利可圖推動勞動力成本降低，比支付的長期福祉員工等。
I think most who worship capitalism start from a false premise that the Divine Purpose of Man is to be an actor or cog in some machinery of economics.我覺得誰最崇拜資本主義從虛假的前提是神人的目的是要成為一個演員，或者在某些機器齒輪經濟學。
There is one big problem here… Let's use as an example the Coke scenario.有一個很大的問題在這裡...讓我們的使用為例焦炭的情況。 Suppose you do come up with a soft-drink that is better than the classic Coke.假設你不拿出一個軟飲料是優於傳統可樂。 People love it, pay you for it, and slowly but surely your product shows promise of becoming a worldwide phenomenon.人們喜歡它，你為它付出，慢慢地但肯定你的產品作出了承諾成為一個世界範圍的現象。 Will the Coca-Cola company stand idly by and just let this happen?將可口可樂公司袖手旁觀，任由這種情況呢？ Would Pepsi do the same?請問百事可樂這樣做？ Of course not.當然不是。 They would use all means (legal or illegal) to stay on top.他們將使用一切手段（合法或非法的），以保持在世界一流。 It's always more difficult to gain ground than to defend it.總是更難以抬頭，而不是捍衛它。 And that is a result of the system, not the person's ability to offer a quality product. ，這是一個系統的結果，而不是人的能力提供高質量的產品。
I'm coming into this discussion about a year late, but I just read you article a few minutes ago, and, I'm sorry, but it has more holes in it than swiss cheese.我來了這個討論晚了一年左右，但我剛才讀你的文章在幾分鐘前，我很抱歉，但有更多的漏洞也比瑞士奶酪。 First off, you say that captailism has allowed us to improve the standard of living of leaps and bounds.首先，你說captailism使我們能夠提高生活水平的跨越式發展。 Really?真的嗎？ You're forgetting the fact that we have technology for solar and wind power, electric cars, yet we still use electricity and gasoline for everything.你忘了的事實是，我們有技術，太陽能和風力發電，電動車，但我們仍然使用電力和汽油的一切。 Why?為什麼？ It's more profitable than solar, wind, and electricity.它的盈利性比太陽能，風能和電力。 MUCH more.更多。 Capitalism raises the standard of living as long as someone gets rich off of it.資本主義提高的生活水平，只要有人獲得了富過它。 Until someone finds a way to heavily profit off of solar or wind power, we will never see it as a primary energy source.直到有人找到辦法把大量利潤的太陽能或風力發電，我們永遠不會看到它作為一個主要的能源來源。 The guy above with the Coke analogy hit the nail on the head.上面這傢伙與可口可樂比喻打釘的頭部。
What's stopping me from creating the next Google?是什麼阻礙，我從創建未來谷歌？ A lot!許多！ Creating something like that takes technical skill.創建類似的東西，需要技術技能。 You can get such skills at college.你可以在大學等技能。 How do you get into college?你如何進入大學？ Student loans.學生貸款。 How do you get student loans?你如何獲得助學貸款？ Amazing credit (honestly, how many college students have super high credit scores?), or a co-signed.神奇信貸（誠實，有多少大學生有超高的信用分數？），或共同簽署的。 What if you don't have a co-signer?如果你沒有共同簽名？ You're SOL.你溶膠。 And don't try to tell me otehrwise because I am living proof.並且不要試圖告訴我otehrwise因為我活生生的例子。 My friend and I tried to go to the same college.我的朋友，我試圖去同一個大學。 He got it.他明白了。 I didn't.我沒有。 Why?為什麼？ He got a co-signed, and I couldn't.他得到了共同簽署了，我不能。 His grandmother has a lot of money, and she gave him what he needed to succeed, but I never had such luck.他的祖母有很多錢，她給了他他所需要的成功，但我從來沒有這麼幸運了。 Capitalism is supposed to work on the theory that whoever works the hardest, succeeds.資本主義是這樣運作的理論，不管是誰的作品最困難，成功。 You tell me how my friend worked harder than I did.你告訴我怎樣工作的，我的朋友比我更加努力。
Speaking of co-signers, you said “In a pre-capitalist “status” society nobility, rank, and birth determined where you stood in the social hierarchy.在談到共同簽署者，你說：“在一個前資本主義”狀態“的社會貴族，職級和生育決定你站在社會等級。 Your “place” in the world was static and you could feel better about yourself: you weren't the king because you weren't born a king and it's not your fault.” All I can say is bull crap.你的“位置”世界是靜態的，你可以感覺到更好地了解自己：你不是國王，因為你不是生在一個國王，這不是你的錯。“我只能說是牛市廢話。 People are born to rich parents everyday, while others are born to poor parents.人們富有的父母所生的日常生活，而另一些出生在貧窮的父母。 The rich kid is gonna go to Yale.豐富的孩子是gonna到耶魯大學。 All the poor kid can hope for is maybe a junior or state college, with a co-signed loan of course.所有的貧困孩子都能希望也許是初級或州立學院，並共同簽署了貸款過程中。 Oh wait, his family is poor, nevermind… Basically, we still like in a world where birth has a lot to do with your status in life.噢等等，他的家庭貧窮，nevermind ...基本上，我們仍然像在世界上誕生，有很多事情要做你在生活中的地位。 The son of the guy who owns the company I work for was born a millionaire, even though he's never worked a day in his life.兒子的傢伙誰擁有我工作的公司誕生一個百萬富翁，儘管他從來沒有過一天，在他的生命。 Don't try and tell me birth has nothing to do with social hierarchy, when proof of the contrary can be seen all around you.不要試圖告訴我的誕生，無關的社會等級中，當證明相反可以看到在你身旁。
You said “If you choose to pursue work in a field that serves less consumers and therefore receives less “economic votes” (money), writing philosophy as opposed to making Coke for example, you're free to do so and enjoy the rewards that come from writing philosophy.你說：“如果你選擇繼續工作，在服務領域的消費者較少，因此收到較少的”經濟票“（錢），寫哲學，而不是使可口可樂例如，你可以這樣做的，享受獎勵來自寫作哲學。
Just don't get angry at “the system” because you're getting less money than the person who satisfies the wants and needs of more people successfully.” I still think you're missing the point here.只是不要生氣在“系統”，因為你的錢越來越少的人誰比滿足的需求和慾望的更多的人成功。“我仍然認為你錯過了一點。 Not everybody has the same aptitude and skills.不是每個人都具有相同的能力和技能。 I can train to be a boxer (for example) all I want, but there are those few people out there born with the personality and natural ability who will always be better than me, even if I train harder than then.我可以訓練成為一名拳擊手（例如）所有我想要的，但也有少數人在那裡出生的個性和自然能力誰總是比我好，即使我刻苦訓練比那時。 I've played hockey for 8 years, I see examples of this everyday.我已經打曲棍球8年，我認為這方面的例子日常生活。 The guy who has the skill to throw a football is gonna make more money than the guy who has the skill to teach a child to read.這傢伙誰的技能扔足球是gonna賺更多的錢比男人誰的技能教孩子閱讀。 Pathetically enough, the football chucker will make more money.可憐的是，足球保鏢將賺更多的錢。 People do what they're good at.人們做他們擅長的。 It's not their fault that their skill isn't valued enough in society.這不是他們的錯，他們的技術是沒有價值的足夠的社會。
It's not a fair system.這不是一個公平的制度。 It's corrupt and rotten to the core.這是腐敗和糜爛。 On paper, your arguments for capitalism are solid, but I don't think you're digging deep enough into the issue here.在紙面上，你的論點，資本主義是穩定的，但我不認為你是挖掘深入考慮的問題所在。 Hopefully my comments will help.希望我的評論會有所幫助。
I see your points Sam but that's just a brutal reality: not everyone has the same talents and skills.我看到您的積分薩姆，但只是一個殘酷的現實：並不是每個人都具有相同的才智和技能。 So what are we to do?那麼，我們怎麼辦？ Bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator or let people rise to where their abilities will take?帶著大家到最低的共同標準，或讓人民起來，把他們的能力會？ You must remember, without a market (people to sell to) no one can ever get rich.你必須記住，如果沒有市場（人們拋售股票）沒有人能致富。 We benefit from the new goods and services business people bring to market and they make money.我們受益於新的產品和服務業務推向市場的人，他們賺錢。 If it's not profitable that doesn't mean its' time has not come yet.如果沒有盈利，這並不意味著它的時間還沒有來。 When green energy is made better it will overthrow older forms of energy without doubt.當綠色能源是由越好推翻舊的能源形式，毫無疑問。 It took a while before railroads overtook barge traffic and horses.過了一段時間才超越了駁船運輸的鐵路和馬匹。 There are times when markets fail and government does need to get involved.有些時候市場失靈和政府也需要參與。 The more orthodox free market folks will say that even in matters like public defense or building a road there are free market solutions but I don't take it that far.更正統的自由市場的人都會說，即使在這樣的公共事務和國防建設的道路有自由市場的解決方案，但我並不那麼遠。 Also, you don't need to go to school to pick up technical skills.此外，您不必去學校接技術技能。 Yes it would help but, especially with the internet, there are alot of opportunities for self-study.是的，它有助於但是，特別是與互聯網，還有很多機會自學。 If you really made it your mission in life to make a better search engine there are ways to do it right now.如果你真的使你的人生使命作出更好的搜索引擎有辦法做到這一點現在。 I'm not saying it would be easy but you could do it.我不是說很容易，但你可以做到這一點。 I'm also not saying the system is perfect but it's better than any other system, especially one where a couple of people with all the guns decide what is worthwhile for everyone (Soviet Union; Iran; China).我也並不是說該系統是完美的，但它比其他任何系統，特別是在一對夫婦一個人所有的槍決定什麼是值得每個人（蘇聯，伊朗，中國）。 Next, if people pay to watch football so what?下一步，如果人們付費收看足球又如何？ It's their money.這是他們的錢。 Who are you to say they can't or shouldn't?誰是你說他們不能或不應該？ You don't have to do it but we live in a free society: people have the right to do what they want as long as they don't violate anyone else's ability to do the same.您沒有做，而是我們生活在一個自由的社會：人民有權利做他們想要的東西，只要不侵犯任何人的能力這樣做。 Lord I could go on forever.主我可以永遠持續下去。 Have you ever read “Atlas Shrugged?” Try it out.你有沒有看過“阿特拉斯聳聳肩？”體驗一下吧。 I don't come from a wealthy family or have a lot of money right now but I don't blame anyone else for my situation.我不來自富裕的家庭，有很多錢，但現在我不責怪任何人對我的處境。 In the end I believe talent does prevail and life can be very humbling: not all of us can be the best or on top.最後我相信，人才不佔上風，生活可以很慚愧：不是所有的，我們可以是最好的或在上面。 But do NOT give up on school if that is what you want.但是不要放棄上學，如果這就是你想要的。 It will work out eventually.它最終將制定。 Yes your road may be tougher but you can still get there.是你的道路可能會更嚴厲，但仍然可以到達那裡。 Good luck.祝您好運。
AK, I love this post.支AK，我喜歡這個職位。 Every word of it.它的每一個字。
Sam, you just pointed out that it's your own struggle that will earn you a living and that others may or may not struggle more or less than you do.三，你剛才指出，這是你自己的鬥爭，將贏得您的生活和其他人可以或不可以的鬥爭多於或少於你怎麼做。 Welcome to capitalism.歡迎到資本主義。 Bill Gates makes millions, so sue him for being richer than you or me.比爾蓋茨使數以百萬計，因此控告他因為富裕程度比你我。 If I got a job, I'd me making more money than an unemployed bum, who complains that the world owes them, in an hour, than he would in his entire life, because I work for my pay and he complains.如果我找到了一份工作，我想我賺更多的錢比失業燒傷，誰抱怨說，世界欠他們在一個小時，比他在他的一生，因為我對我的工作薪酬和他抱怨。
Cuervo, if Coka Cola and Pepsi are really evil enough to stop you from … selling a better brand of soda than them (?) then why do we still have Cola and Pepsi?奎爾沃，如果措卡可口可樂和百事可樂是真正的邪惡足以讓你不再...更好的品牌銷售比他們的汽水（？），那麼為什麼我們仍然有可口可樂和百事可樂？ They're competitive brands, along with any number of generic brand sodas that sell cheaper because they're cheaper to make.他們競爭力的品牌，以及任意數量的通用品牌汽水的價格出售，因為他們要便宜。 I can get a can of Cola for fifty cents, but there's a generic brand that's only 35 cents because Cola costs more money to make, so they have to sell it more to make up for it.我能得到一罐可口可樂為50美分，但是有一個通用的品牌只有35美分，因為可口可樂的成本，使更多的錢，因此他們不得不出售更以彌補它。 It's called profit and if they didn't make a profit, their workers would quit, the company would collapse, and the company would cease to exist.這就是所謂的利潤，如果他們不賺錢，他們的工人將辭職，公司會崩潰，並且該公司將不復存在。
Mark, if all capitalists are criminals, why isn't Oprah Winfrey in jail?馬克，如果所有的資本家是罪犯，為什麼不奧普拉在監獄裡？ Or Bill Gates?還是比爾蓋茨？ Or the CEO of Disney, McDonalds, Burger King, CostCo, Barns & Nobles or Dell?或首席執行官迪斯尼，麥當勞，漢堡王，Costco公司，穀倉和貴族或戴爾？ Theft is illegal.盜竊罪是非法的。 Creating jobs, meeting a payroll, creating wealth, and being paid are what good people do to live.創造就業機會，會議工資，創造財富，他們的收入是做什麼用的人居住。 If they just didn't do any of these things, they'd die.如果他們只是沒有做任何這些東西，他們就會死亡。 They would stop making money, they wouldn't be able to buy food, shelter, or water, and they'd starve in the streets till they day they died.他們將停止賺錢，他們將無法購買食物，住所，或水，他們會餓死在街頭，他們直到他們每天死亡。 They're not stealing your money, you're paying for a good or service, like a car, a burger, a back massage, or home repairs.他們不偷你的錢，你支付貨物或服務，如汽車，漢堡，背部按摩，或家庭修理。 If you want to keep your money, don't pay for anything and see how legal that is to not pay for anything.如果你想保持你的錢，不支付任何東西，看看法律是不支付任何東西。 If you really think these people are criminal for making money, don't give it to them.如果你真的以為這些人是非法賺錢，根本不考慮他們。
Me?我？ I don't have a job.我沒有工作。 I've never been employed.我從來沒有就業。 I don't make money.我不賺錢。 I'm taking classes at the local Jr. Collage.我正在上課的地方小拼貼。 My great-grandmother next door to us is helping to pay for it along with my parents.我的曾祖母隔壁給我們的幫助付出連同我的父母。 I would like to get a job and move out on my own but I can't.我想找到工作，並提出了關於我自己的，但我不能。 I can't get a job because 'big businesses', that people think are so evil, don't have the money to hire people.我無法找到工作，因為'大企業'，人們認為是如此邪惡，沒有錢聘請的人。 They don't have the money because 'big government', which people think is so helpful for some reason, is taxing them too much because they promised the voters to 'redistribute the wealth' which is short for 'taking money from people who earn it and giving it to unemployed bums who don't want to make their own money because big government gives it to them anyway from the pockets of people who make their own money'.他們沒有錢，因為'大政府'，這使人們認為是有益的某些原因，是他們徵稅太多，因為他們所承諾的選民'重新分配財富'這是短期的'以人的錢誰賺並把它交給失業燒傷誰不想讓自己的錢，因為龐大的政府賦予它無論如何，從他們的口袋裡的人們誰使自己的錢'。
Thanks for posting this, AK.感謝張貼此，支AK。