If you want to know why so many people hate capitalism even though the capitalist system of economic management has allowed humanity to raise it's standard of living by leaps and bounds since it was first implemented read The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality by Ludwig von Mises.如果你想知道为什么那么多人讨厌即使经济管理的资本主义制度使人类能够提高它的跨越式的生活标准，因为它已开始实施，改为反资本主义的路德维希冯米塞斯心理资本主义。 [1] [1]
von Mises was an influential Austrian economist of the 20 th century who emigrated to the United States in 1940.冯米塞斯是一个有影响力的20世纪谁在1940年移民到美国奥地利经济学家。 [2] [2]
In this book he argues that people hate capitalism because deep down they know capitalism has given them the opportunity to be as successful as they desire (who's stopping you from starting the next Google?) but they either didn't or couldn't make it happen.在这本书中，他认为，人们痛恨资本主义，因为他们知道内心深处资本主义给了他们机会一样成功，他们的愿望（谁在阻止开始下谷歌？你），但他们要么没有或无法令发生。
“What makes people feel unhappy under capitalism is the fact that capitalism grants to each the opportunity to attain the most desirable positions which, of course, can only be attained by a few. “使资本主义制度下，人们觉得不开心的是，资本主义的赠款，每个有机会达到最理想的，当然，只能由少数达到立场。 Whatever a man may have gained for himself, it is mostly a mere fraction of what his ambition has impelled him to win.无论一个人可以有自己经验，它主要是对他有什么野心，激励他赢得的一小部分。 There are always before his eyes people who have succeeded where he has failed.总是有谁在他眼前地方取得了成功，他失败的人。 There are fellows who have outstripped him and against whom he nurtures, in his subconsciousness, inferiority complexes.有研究员谁已经超过他，他针对的人在他的潜意识培养，自卑感。 Such is the attitude of the tramp against the man with a regular job, the factory hand against the foreman, the executive against the vice-president, the vice-president against the company's president, the man who is worth three hundred thousand dollars against the millionaire and so on.这就是反对该男子流浪汉与固定的工作态度，对工厂的工头另一方面，对副行政总裁，副，对公司的总裁，该名男子谁是值得反对300000元总裁百万富翁等。 Everybody's self-reliance and moral equilibrium are undermined by the spectacle of those who have given proof of greater abilities and capacities.每个人的自力更生和道义上的平衡受到损害的那些谁给了更大的能力和行为能力的证明景象。 Everybody is aware of his own defeat and insufficiency.”每个人都意识到自己的失败和不足。“ [3] [3]
In a pre-capitalist “status” society nobility, rank, and birth determined where you stood in the social hierarchy.在一个前资本主义“状态”的社会贵族，职级和生育决定你站在社会等级。 Your “place” in the world was static and you could feel better about yourself: you weren't the king because you weren't born a king and it wasn't your fault.你的“位置”世界上是静态的，你可以对自己的感觉更好：你是不是因为你没有出生的国王，这是不是你的错。
But in a capitalist economy operating in a free society you don't have that excuse.但在一个自由社会的资本主义经济的运行你没有这样的借口。
Why?为什么？
Because with capitalism a person is not rewarded economically because of their birth rank but in accordance “to his contribution to the well-being of his fellow men and where thus everybody is the founder of his own fortune.”因为在资本主义的人是没有得到，因为他们的出生排名，而是根据经济“，他的贡献福祉男子和他的同胞，因此每个人都在他自己的财富的创始人。” [4] [4]
The consumer is king.消费者为王。
The person able to meet the unsatisfied demands of the most consumers in the cheapest and best way possible gets the most “status points” (money).的人能够满足大多数消费者在最廉价和最好得不到满足的需求可能的方式获得最“状态点”（钱）。
More importantly, everyone is free to try to “de-throne” the existing economic order at any time and make a fortune of their own by appealing to the “sovereign consumer.”更重要的是，每个人都可以自由地尝试“非王位”现有在任何时候经济秩序的呼吁，向“主权消费者作出自己的财富。”
It may be hard, but if you want to dis-lodge Coke as the global soft-drink powerhouse make a better soft drink more people want to drink.可能很难，但如果你想解散提出作为全球软饮料巨头创造更美好的软饮料可口可乐希望更多的人喝。
Can't?不能？ Don't know how?不知道如何？
Then it's your lack of knowledge, will, and/or ability that is the cause of your frustrated ambition, not capitalism.然后，这是你的知识缺乏，意志和/或能力，这是您的野心受挫的原因，不是资本主义的。
“It is-in a market not sabotaged by government-imposed restrictions, exclusively your fault if you do not outstrip the chocolate king, the movie star and the boxing champion.” “这是不是由政府破坏市场施加的限制，完全你的错，如果你不超出巧克力国王，电影明星和拳击冠军。” [5] [5]
von Mises argues it is this knowledge of one's limitations, revealed by capitalism, that breeds a deep resentment among people who have failed to achieve the level of success they want but who are also unable to admit they are the cause of their failure.冯米塞斯认为这是一个人的知识的局限性，资本主义透露，该品种之间谁也不能达到的水平，他们想要的成功，但谁也不能承认自己是其失败的原因，人民的深切不满。
It's much easier and psychologically more satisfying to blame capitalism for your failures:它更容易和更满意的心理为自己的失败归咎于资本主义：
“In order to console himself and to restore his self-assertion, such a man is in search of a scapegoat. “为了安慰自己，并恢复他的自我主张，这样的人是在寻找一个替罪羊。 He tries to persuade himself that he failed through no fault of his own.他试图说服自己，他通过自己没有过错失败。 He is at least as brilliant, efficient, and industrious as those who outshine him.他至少是同样出色，高效，那些谁一枝独秀他勤奋。 Unfortunately, this nefarious social order of ours does not accord the prizes to the most meritorious men; it crowns the dishonest unscrupulous scoundrel, the swindler, the exploiter, the 'rugged individualist.'不幸的是，我们的邪恶社会秩序不给予奖励，对最优秀的男人，它矗立在不诚实无良流氓，是骗子，剥削者，是'坚固的个人主义。 What made himself fail was his honesty.是什么让自己不被他的诚实。 He was too decent to resort to the base tricks to which his successful rivals owe their ascendancy.他太体面诉诸基地的技巧，他的成功归功于他们的对手优势。 As conditions are under capitalism, a man is forced to choose between virtue and poverty on the one hand, and vices and riches on the other.由于资本主义的条件下，一个人是被迫与贫困之间的道德选择一方面，和罪恶和财富，另一方面。 He, himself, thank God, chose the former alternative and rejected the latter.”他，他感谢上帝，选择了前者的替代，拒绝了后者。“ [6] [6]
Sound familiar?听起来很熟悉？
Does this mean capitalism gives us total control over our destiny?这是否意味着资本主义给我们带来了我们的命运完全控制？
Of course not:当然不是：
“It cannot remove or alleviate the innate handicaps with which nature has discriminated against many people. “它不能消除或减轻的性质与对许多人天生残疾的歧视。 It cannot change the fact that many are born sick or become disabled in later life.”它不能改变，许多人有病或出生后成为终生残疾的事实。“ [7] [7]
But it can give you a chance to earn the wealth you want through your own efforts.但它可以给你一个机会来赚取自己的努力你想要的财富。
If you choose to pursue work in a field that serves less consumers and therefore receives less “economic votes” (money), writing philosophy as opposed to making Coke for example, you're free to do so and enjoy the rewards that come from that line of work.如果您选择继续在服务领域的消费者较少，因此工作收到较少的“经济票”（钱），写作哲学而不是使例如可口可乐，你可以这样做的，享受来自该来奖励线工作。
Just don't get angry at “the system” because you're getting less money than the person who satisfies the wants and needs of more people successfully.只是不要生气在“系统”，因为你的钱越来越少的人谁比满足的需求和欲望更多的人成功。
That's how it's supposed to work and it's a fair system: if you want to be economically rich you're free to do so right after you finish reading this post.这就是它应该工作，这是一个公平的制度：如果你想在经济上富裕你可以这样做的权利，读完之后，你这个职位。
All you have to do is figure out a way to satisfy the wants and needs of more “sovereign consumers” and take Winston Churchill's advice literally: “Never, never, never, never give up.”你所要做的就是找出一种方式，以满足更多的希望和“主权消费者的需求”，并采取温斯顿丘吉尔的意见，从字面上：“永远，永远，永远，永远不会放弃。”
[1] [1] Ludwig Von Mises. The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality .米塞斯。 反资本主义的心态 。 (New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1956). （纽约：D.诺斯特兰德公司，1956年）。
[2] [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises
[3] [3] von Mises, 12-13.冯米塞斯，12-13。
[4] [4] Ibid, 15.同上，15。
[5] [5] Ibid, 10.同上，10。
[6] [6] Ibid, 14.同上，14。
[7] [7] Ibid, 10.同上，10。
{ 7 comments… read them below or （7条评论...阅读下面或他们 add one添加一个 } ）
I would like to point you to a review of Mises' aforementioned book on Amazon which pretty much rebuts your article:我想给你提供了米瑟斯的书在亚马逊上述检讨，几乎反驳你的文章： http://www.amazon.com/review/R24G7E0RJNGV3/ref=cm_cr_pr_cmt?%5Fencoding=UTF8&ASIN=0865976716 http://www.amazon.com/review/R24G7E0RJNGV3/ref=cm_cr_pr_cmt？％5Fencoding = UTF8的＆ASIN来= 0865976716
Well Mike, I wouldn't use the word “rebut” but it does lay out the other side of the argument.那么迈克，我不会用“反驳”，但它确实布置参数的另一边。 What it comes down to, from my point of view, are these points: is there a difference between earned and unearned wealth?; even if some people make their money without earning it in our system of capitalism because of government favors etc, does that negate the fundamental argument von Mises is making?它涉及到从我的角度来看，有以下几点：是否有关系来之不易，不劳而获的财富？，即使有些人甚至没有收入，因为在我们的政府是资本主义制度，主张把钱等的差异，这是否否定的基本参数冯米塞斯的决策？ If you read the whole book you will see he is quite aware of the impact of government intereference, inheritance, and other wealth “delivering” factors that have nothing to do with ability.如果您阅读整本书你会发现他是相当政府intereference，继承带来的影响，和其他财富“发放”的因素有没有关系的能力。 Yet, his point is, those are the exceptions and not the rule in a capitalist economy.然而，他的观点是，这些是例外，而不是在资本主义经济规律。 Moreover, the people who get their money that way, as long as they are not protected generation after generation by some government power, will eventually lose that wealth because they do not know how it was produced in the first place.此外，人民的钱谁获得这种方式，只要没有受到保护后，一些政府权力的一代又一代，最终会失去财富，因为他们不知道它是如何在已产生的。 Thanks for the link to the review and your comment.感谢的审查和您的评论链接。
The von Mises argument is simply petty.冯米塞斯的说法只不过是小。 I think the obvious failure of capitalism is that in the end it is a criminal enterprise all together.我认为资本主义的明显失败，最终它是一个企业的所有共同犯罪。 Taken to its logical ends, it can only end with human abuse and destruction of nature.两者的逻辑结束，它只能是人类滥用和破坏大自然。 There is no other possible endpoint.没有其他可能的端点。 When I say “criminal” I mean that it fails to deliver any natural justice because it wall always follow the path of least resistance – a path which devalues Man (because it is cheaper and possible to do so) and destroys nature, the ultimate source of the wealth.当我说“罪犯”我的意思是它没有提供任何自然正义，因为它总是走壁的阻力最小的道路-一个路径是贬低人（因为它更便宜，可以这样做），和破坏自然，最终的来源的财富。
Following the path of least resistance is the essential part of the profit algorithm.继阻力最小的方向是利润算法的重要组成部分。 ie Far easier (profitable) to dump waste in the river than to reprocess it safely.即要容易得多（利润），以河中倾倒废料再加工它，而不是安全。 Far more profitable to drive labor costs down, than to pay for the long term well-being of employees, and so on.更加有利可图推动劳动力成本降低，比支付的长期福祉员工等。
I think most who worship capitalism start from a false premise that the Divine Purpose of Man is to be an actor or cog in some machinery of economics.我想大多数从虚假的前提，即人神的宗旨是成为一个演员或在某些经济学机械齿轮谁崇拜资本主义的开始。
There is one big problem here… Let's use as an example the Coke scenario.有一个很大的问题在这里...让我们的使用为例焦炭的情况。 Suppose you do come up with a soft-drink that is better than the classic Coke.假设你不拿出一个软饮料是比传统可乐更好。 People love it, pay you for it, and slowly but surely your product shows promise of becoming a worldwide phenomenon.人们喜欢它，付出你，缓慢而稳步地展示您的产品成为一个世界范围的现象的承诺。 Will the Coca-Cola company stand idly by and just let this happen?将可口可乐公司袖手旁观，任由这种情况呢？ Would Pepsi do the same?请问百事可乐这样做？ Of course not.当然不是。 They would use all means (legal or illegal) to stay on top.他们将使用一切手段（合法或非法的），以保持在世界一流。 It's always more difficult to gain ground than to defend it.总是更难以抬头，而不是捍卫它。 And that is a result of the system, not the person's ability to offer a quality product. ，这是一个系统的结果，而不是人的能力提供高质量的产品。
I'm coming into this discussion about a year late, but I just read you article a few minutes ago, and, I'm sorry, but it has more holes in it than swiss cheese.我来了这个讨论大约晚一年，但我刚才读你的文章在几分钟前，我很抱歉，但因为它有更多的漏洞比瑞士奶酪。 First off, you say that captailism has allowed us to improve the standard of living of leaps and bounds.首先，你说captailism使我们能够改善跨越式发展的生活水平。 Really?真的吗？ You're forgetting the fact that we have technology for solar and wind power, electric cars, yet we still use electricity and gasoline for everything.你忘了的事实是，我们有太阳能和风力发电，电动车技术，但我们仍然使用电力和汽油的一切。 Why?为什么？ It's more profitable than solar, wind, and electricity.它的盈利性比太阳能，风能和电力。 MUCH more.更多。 Capitalism raises the standard of living as long as someone gets rich off of it.资本主义的生活水平提高了，只要有人被它丰富的小康标准。 Until someone finds a way to heavily profit off of solar or wind power, we will never see it as a primary energy source.直到有人找到办法大量利润的太阳能或风力发电，我们将永远看不到作为一个主要的能源来源将它关闭。 The guy above with the Coke analogy hit the nail on the head.可口可乐与上述比喻家伙击中了要害。
What's stopping me from creating the next Google?什么是阻止创造未来谷歌我？ A lot!许多！ Creating something like that takes technical skill.创建这样的需要技术技能的东西。 You can get such skills at college.你可以在大学这种技能。 How do you get into college?你如何进入大学？ Student loans.学生贷款。 How do you get student loans?你如何获得助学贷款？ Amazing credit (honestly, how many college students have super high credit scores?), or a co-signed.神奇信贷（诚实，有多少大学生有超高的信用分数？），或共同签署的。 What if you don't have a co-signer?如果你没有共同签名？ You're SOL.你溶胶。 And don't try to tell me otehrwise because I am living proof.并且不要试图告诉我otehrwise因为我活生生的例子。 My friend and I tried to go to the same college.我的朋友，我试图去同一个大学。 He got it.他明白了。 I didn't.我没有。 Why?为什么？ He got a co-signed, and I couldn't.他得到了共同签署了，我不能。 His grandmother has a lot of money, and she gave him what he needed to succeed, but I never had such luck.他的祖母有很多钱，她给了他他所需要的成功，但我从来没有这么幸运了。 Capitalism is supposed to work on the theory that whoever works the hardest, succeeds.资本主义是这样运作的理论，不管是谁的作品最困难，成功。 You tell me how my friend worked harder than I did.你告诉我怎样工作的，我的朋友比我更加努力。
Speaking of co-signers, you said “In a pre-capitalist “status” society nobility, rank, and birth determined where you stood in the social hierarchy.在谈到共同签署者，你说在一个前“资本主义的”地位“的社会贵族，职级和决心，你出生在社会等级为。 Your “place” in the world was static and you could feel better about yourself: you weren't the king because you weren't born a king and it's not your fault.” All I can say is bull crap.你的“位置”世界上是静态的，你可以对自己的感觉更好：你是不是因为你没有出生的国王，这不是你的错。“我只能说是牛市废话。 People are born to rich parents everyday, while others are born to poor parents.人们日常出生富有的父母，有些则是出生在贫穷的父母。 The rich kid is gonna go to Yale.丰富的孩子是gonna到耶鲁大学。 All the poor kid can hope for is maybe a junior or state college, with a co-signed loan of course.所有的贫困孩子都能希望也许是初级或州立学院，并共同签署的，当然贷款。 Oh wait, his family is poor, nevermind… Basically, we still like in a world where birth has a lot to do with your status in life.噢等等，他的家庭贫穷，nevermind ...基本上，我们仍然像在世界上诞生，有很多事情要做你在生活中的地位。 The son of the guy who owns the company I work for was born a millionaire, even though he's never worked a day in his life.在那个谁拥有我工作的公司诞生一个百万富翁的儿子，尽管他从来没有过一天，在他的生命。 Don't try and tell me birth has nothing to do with social hierarchy, when proof of the contrary can be seen all around you.不要试图告诉我的诞生，没有任何社会等级制度，当相反的证据可以看到你周围的一切。
You said “If you choose to pursue work in a field that serves less consumers and therefore receives less “economic votes” (money), writing philosophy as opposed to making Coke for example, you're free to do so and enjoy the rewards that come from writing philosophy.你说：“如果你选择继续在服务领域的消费者较少，因此工作收到较少的”经济票“（钱），写作哲学而不是使例如可口可乐，你可以这样做的，享受奖励来自写作哲学。
Just don't get angry at “the system” because you're getting less money than the person who satisfies the wants and needs of more people successfully.” I still think you're missing the point here.只是不要生气在“系统”，因为你的钱越来越少的人谁比满足欲望和需要的更多的人成功。“我仍然认为你错过了一点。 Not everybody has the same aptitude and skills.不是每个人都具有相同的能力和技能。 I can train to be a boxer (for example) all I want, but there are those few people out there born with the personality and natural ability who will always be better than me, even if I train harder than then.我可以训练成为一名拳击手（例如）所有我想要的，但也有在那里与自然的个性和能力谁总是比我好出生的少数人，即使我刻苦训练比那时。 I've played hockey for 8 years, I see examples of this everyday.我已经在8年曲棍球，我看到这个日常生活中的例子。 The guy who has the skill to throw a football is gonna make more money than the guy who has the skill to teach a child to read.这家伙谁的技能扔足球是gonna赚更多的钱比男人谁的技能教孩子阅读。 Pathetically enough, the football chucker will make more money.可怜的是，足球保镖将赚更多的钱。 People do what they're good at.人们做他们在很不错。 It's not their fault that their skill isn't valued enough in society.这不是他们的错，他们的技术是没有价值的足够的社会。
It's not a fair system.这不是一个公平的制度。 It's corrupt and rotten to the core.这是腐败和糜烂。 On paper, your arguments for capitalism are solid, but I don't think you're digging deep enough into the issue here.在纸面上，对资本主义的论点是不错，但我不认为你是挖掘到足够深的问题在这里。 Hopefully my comments will help.希望我的评论会有所帮助。
I see your points Sam but that's just a brutal reality: not everyone has the same talents and skills.我看到您的积分萨姆，但只是一个残酷的现实：并不是每个人都具有相同的才智和技能。 So what are we to do?那么，我们怎么办？ Bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator or let people rise to where their abilities will take?带着大家到最低的共同标准，或让人民起来，把他们的能力会？ You must remember, without a market (people to sell to) no one can ever get rich.你必须记住，如果没有市场（人们抛售股票）没有人能致富。 We benefit from the new goods and services business people bring to market and they make money.我们的新产品和人民的利益服务业务推向市场，他们赚钱。 If it's not profitable that doesn't mean its' time has not come yet.如果没有盈利，这并不意味着它的时间还没有来。 When green energy is made better it will overthrow older forms of energy without doubt.当绿色能源是取得了较好它无疑将推翻旧的能源形式。 It took a while before railroads overtook barge traffic and horses.过了一段时间才超越了驳船运输的铁路和马匹。 There are times when markets fail and government does need to get involved.有些时候市场失灵和政府也需要参与。 The more orthodox free market folks will say that even in matters like public defense or building a road there are free market solutions but I don't take it that far.更正统的自由市场的人都会说，即使如国防，建设公共道路的问题有自由市场的解决方案，但我不认为远。 Also, you don't need to go to school to pick up technical skills.此外，您不必去学校接技术技能。 Yes it would help but, especially with the internet, there are alot of opportunities for self-study.是的，它会帮助，但特别是与互联网，有一个自我的机会很多研究。 If you really made it your mission in life to make a better search engine there are ways to do it right now.如果你真的使你在生活中的使命作出更好的搜索引擎有办法做到这一点现在。 I'm not saying it would be easy but you could do it.我不是说很容易，但你可以做到这一点。 I'm also not saying the system is perfect but it's better than any other system, especially one where a couple of people with all the guns decide what is worthwhile for everyone (Soviet Union; Iran; China).我也并不是说该系统是完美的，但它比其他任何系统，尤其是一个在人的所有枪支夫妇决定什么是对每个人都值得（苏联，伊朗，中国）。 Next, if people pay to watch football so what?下一步，如果人们付费收看足球又如何？ It's their money.这是他们的钱。 Who are you to say they can't or shouldn't?谁是你说他们不能或不应该？ You don't have to do it but we live in a free society: people have the right to do what they want as long as they don't violate anyone else's ability to do the same.您没有做，而是我们生活在一个自由的社会生活：人民有权利做他们想要的东西，只要不侵犯任何人的能力这样做。 Lord I could go on forever.主我可以永远持续下去。 Have you ever read “Atlas Shrugged?” Try it out.你有没有看过“阿特拉斯耸耸肩？”体验一下吧。 I don't come from a wealthy family or have a lot of money right now but I don't blame anyone else for my situation.我不来自富裕的家庭，有很多钱的权利，但我不责怪任何人我的情况。 In the end I believe talent does prevail and life can be very humbling: not all of us can be the best or on top.最后我相信，人才不占上风，生活可以很惭愧：不是每一个人都可以是最好或在上面。 But do NOT give up on school if that is what you want.但是不要给学校了，如果这就是你想要的。 It will work out eventually.它最终将制定。 Yes your road may be tougher but you can still get there.是你的道路可能会更严厉，但仍然可以到达那里。 Good luck.祝您好运。
AK, I love this post.支AK，我喜欢这个职位。 Every word of it.每一个字。
Sam, you just pointed out that it's your own struggle that will earn you a living and that others may or may not struggle more or less than you do.三，你刚才指出，这是你自己的斗争，将赢得您的生活和其他人可以或不可以的斗争多于或少于你怎么做。 Welcome to capitalism.欢迎到资本主义。 Bill Gates makes millions, so sue him for being richer than you or me.比尔盖茨使数以百万计，因此控告他因为富裕程度比你我。 If I got a job, I'd me making more money than an unemployed bum, who complains that the world owes them, in an hour, than he would in his entire life, because I work for my pay and he complains.如果我找到了一份工作，我想我比失业使烧伤，谁抱怨说，世界欠他们在一个小时，比他在他的一生，因为我对我的工作薪酬和他抱怨更多的钱。
Cuervo, if Coka Cola and Pepsi are really evil enough to stop you from … selling a better brand of soda than them (?) then why do we still have Cola and Pepsi?奎尔沃，如果措卡可口可乐和百事可乐是真正的邪恶足以让你不再...售卖汽水比他们更好的品牌（？），那么为什么我们仍然有可口可乐和百事可乐？ They're competitive brands, along with any number of generic brand sodas that sell cheaper because they're cheaper to make.他们竞争力的品牌，以及任何品牌的普通汽水的价格出售，因为他们要便宜一些。 I can get a can of Cola for fifty cents, but there's a generic brand that's only 35 cents because Cola costs more money to make, so they have to sell it more to make up for it.我能获得50美分的可口可乐可以，但是有一个通用的品牌只有35美分，因为可口可乐的成本，使更多的钱，因此他们不得不出售更以弥补它。 It's called profit and if they didn't make a profit, their workers would quit, the company would collapse, and the company would cease to exist.这就是所谓的利润，如果他们不赚钱，他们的工人将辞职，公司会崩溃，并且该公司将不复存在。
Mark, if all capitalists are criminals, why isn't Oprah Winfrey in jail?马克，如果所有的资本家是罪犯，为什么不奥普拉在监狱里？ Or Bill Gates?还是比尔盖茨？ Or the CEO of Disney, McDonalds, Burger King, CostCo, Barns & Nobles or Dell?或迪斯尼，麦当劳，汉堡王，Costco公司，谷仓和贵族或戴尔CEO？ Theft is illegal.盗窃罪是非法的。 Creating jobs, meeting a payroll, creating wealth, and being paid are what good people do to live.创造就业机会，会议工资，创造财富，他们的收入是做什么用的人居住。 If they just didn't do any of these things, they'd die.如果他们只是没有做这些事情，他们就会死亡。 They would stop making money, they wouldn't be able to buy food, shelter, or water, and they'd starve in the streets till they day they died.他们将停止赚钱，他们将无法购买食物，住所，或水，他们会饿死在街头，他们直到他们每天死亡。 They're not stealing your money, you're paying for a good or service, like a car, a burger, a back massage, or home repairs.他们不偷你的钱，你支付货物或服务，如汽车，汉堡，背部按摩，或家庭修理。 If you want to keep your money, don't pay for anything and see how legal that is to not pay for anything.如果你想保持你的钱，不支付任何东西，看看法律是不支付任何东西。 If you really think these people are criminal for making money, don't give it to them.如果你真的认为这些人是赚钱的犯罪，根本不考虑他们。
Me?我？ I don't have a job.我没有工作。 I've never been employed.我从来没有就业。 I don't make money.我不赚钱。 I'm taking classes at the local Jr. Collage.我正在在当地小拼贴类。 My great-grandmother next door to us is helping to pay for it along with my parents.我的曾祖母隔壁我们正在帮助它支付连同我的父母。 I would like to get a job and move out on my own but I can't.我想找到工作，并提出自己出去，但我不能。 I can't get a job because 'big businesses', that people think are so evil, don't have the money to hire people.我无法找到工作，因为'大企业'，人们认为是如此邪恶，没有钱聘请的人。 They don't have the money because 'big government', which people think is so helpful for some reason, is taxing them too much because they promised the voters to 'redistribute the wealth' which is short for 'taking money from people who earn it and giving it to unemployed bums who don't want to make their own money because big government gives it to them anyway from the pockets of people who make their own money'.他们没有钱，因为'大政府'，这使人们认为是由于某种原因有帮助，是他们征税太多，因为他们所承诺的选民'重新分配财富'这是短期的'录取的人谁赚钱并把它交给失业烧伤谁不想让自己的钱，因为庞大的政府赋予它无论如何他们从谁的人作出自己的口袋里的钱'。
Thanks for posting this, AK.感谢张贴此，支AK。